This Sunday is the final day to register for PowerShift 2011, a conference sponsored by the Energy Action Coalition (a partner group of REC), dedicated to furthering the youth climate movement. The conference has taken place every other year since 2007. At the inaugural PowerShift, political leaders like Nancy Pelosi and Van Jones addressed the crowd of over 6,000 promoting economic and environmental justice with the creation of millions of “green jobs.” Students left the conference and began organizing politically around green-collar jobs and clean energy, looking toward the 2008 elections. However, the momentum did not stop there. In 2009, a group of 12,000 members of the movement got together in Washington, DC to discuss, learn, and create campaigns to bring back to their communities. Here, thousands of students engaged in the Capitol Climate Action, successfully shutting down Washington DC’s coal-fired power plant.

This year students, organizers, entrepreneurs, workers, youth from all walks of life reconvene once again. This time the goal is to create a comprehensive strategy that will be able to be implemented by attendees across the country. The focus will be much more centered on movement building than ever before, working on three main campaigns: “Catalyzing the Clean Energy Economy,” “Campus Climate Challenge 2.0,” and “Beyond Dirty Energy.” Attendees will attend workshops to gain the skills necessary for launching these campaigns on their campuses and in their communities.

The Responsible Endowments Coalition is just one of 50 partner organizations involved with the Energy Action Coalition (EAC), promoting social, economic, and environmental justice. However, most of these organizations are more traditional environmental groups, organizing campaigns around clean energy on campus or creation of green jobs, REC has a slightly different and complimentary approach. While the work of the EAC on the ground is vastly important to the success of the youth climate movement, REC likes to hit people where it hurts: their wallets. REC campaigns on university campuses have the potential to shift large millions of dollars away from destructive environmental practices and towards alternative energy. Institutional investors have successfully filed resolutions to work towards a cleaner future with banks and companies including JP Morgan Chase, XTO Energy, ExxonMobil, and ConocoPhillips. Universities are institutional investors and can have the same power when filing a resolution to promote alternative energy. Most notably, in 2010 Loyola University of Chicago filed a resolution with JP Morgan Chase concerning financing of mountain top removal, an extremely environmentally hazardous form of coal mining in Appalachia.

Climate change is a real problem that can only be stopped by us. We need people on the ground demanding for green jobs, reduced carbon emissions, and clean air and water for all. But we also need people on campuses pressuring their universities to take a stand with their money, using their considerable wealth to say to the corporations practicing mountain top removal and offshore drilling, pumping our air full of dangerous carbon emissions that they need to give us something better. So join REC and the EAC at PowerShift 2011, This could very well be the 11^th hour.

For more information and to register for PowerShift 2011 visit http://www.powershift2011.org.

According to the release:

“High profile water contamination incidents, new litigation, and public protests that include calls for moratoria on natural gas permitting all suggest sizeable and rising business risks to companies and attendant threats to shareholder value,” said Richard Liroff, executive director of the Investor Environmental Health Network (IEHN), which helped coordinate the resolutions. “Shareholders need assurance that companies are candidly disclosing these risks and are adopting best management practices to minimize them.”

Investors filing the resolutions include the New York State Comptroller (Cabot Oil & Gas, Carrizo Oil & Gas), Domini Social Investments (Southwestern Energy), As You Sow (ExxonMobil and Ultra Petroleum), Trillium Asset Management (Anadarko), Miller/Howard Investments (El Paso and Energen), and The Sisters of St. Francis of Philadelphia (Chevron). Cabot Oil & Gas, Carrizo Oil & Gas, El Paso, Southwestern and Ultra Petroleum are headquartered in Houston; Energen is based in Birmingham, Alabama; Anadarko in The Woodlands, Texas; Exxon Mobil in Irving Texas, and Chevron in San Ramon, California.

Read the whole release at IEHN .

Around the world, people are debating how to regulate emissions to stop climate change. On Capitol Hill, Democrats and Republicans are engaged in an on going battle. I believe, strongly, that no widely accepted proposal that has been offered to date goes nearly far enough to create the transition to a carbon-neutral economy. Much of the ongoing debate, on both sides, talks instead about balancing the economic costs of regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

Both sides in the political debate talk about ensuring that we don’t hurt our economy while implementing policies to prevent climate change. Companies, on the other hand, are spending millions of dollars lobbying to prevent a real, comprehensive climate-change and energy bill, often claiming that climate change doesn’t exist or is man-made.

In our work with shareholder advocates like CERES, the Responsible Endowments Coalition often encounters companies saying that they are trying to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions but that any major change should be left up to the government, while at the same time lobbying against regulation. Many companies also say that they are prepared for the risks that are posed by climate change.

The first statement may be true. The latter is patently false. Almost no company is prepared for the risks of climate change. Similar to the country itself, they may be prepared for climate change regulation, but not the dramatic outcomes of climate change itself.

The risk of climate change, like that of nuclear weapons, is existential in nature. We may spend decades talking about addressing climate change without actually taking action. There is a chance that we will be fine, but there is a good chance that we will not.

A False Choice

One thing is crystal clear, as with company risks, the choice between our economy and preventing climate change is a false one. While some can say that regulation may hurt the economy, the truth is that no regulation at all will kill it, and, there is a slim chance, also kill every one of us.

Almost everyone that cares about these issues hopes that the science proves wrong. But most evidence points in the opposite direction. While the effects are currently unknown, climate change is a risk we cannot ignore. Like we do in many things from government spending to waste, we risk mortgaging our future generations.

The only real choice is to move to a clean energy economy, based primarily on incredible reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Whether we regulate or not, we face major changes to our economy. We must not make a bet on ten years of positive economic growth in exchange for the future of the planet. We also must not count on our ability to overcome the effects of climate change and leave many with less resource than us, in the Global South and elsewhere, to suffer.

At risk of being cliché, following the words of one of the founders of Earth Day, Senator Gaylord Nelson, who called for a “nationwide grassroots demonstration on behalf of the environment.” Remember the original spirit of Earth Day. Don’t just go outside. Rise up and take a stand against the corporations fighting to continue polluting and fight for meaningful legislative action now.

Join the Responsible Endowments Coalition, the Energy Action Coalition, and all of its member groups as we work to make changes that will protect our people and our planet for years to come.

Mountaintop removal (MTR) is an incredibly destructive process that clearcuts forests, decimates mountains, and ruins ecosystems. Communities around MTR sites have experienced severe health consequences from the processes’ waste materials – toxic metals and chemicals that coal companies dump into surrounding streambeds. People in these areas experience high flood risks, have lost access to clean and safe drinking water, and have astonishingly high rates of lung cancer, chronic heart, lung, and kidney diseases, and even death. For more information on how companies extract coal from thin seams in the mountains, and how MTR destroys communities and ecosystems, check out Mountain Justice’s explanation of the process.

There’s no question that mountaintop removal is bad for the environment, contributing 25-30% of greenhouse gas emissions each year despite providing only 7% of the United States’ coal. Surface mining has leveled 7% of all Appalachian forests since 1992. Proponents of mountaintop removal will argue that it creates jobs and generates revenue for low-income communities. This claim is true, as investigated in a 2009 report by West Virginia University. The researchers found that the coal industry generates $8 billion per year for Appalachia. However, the estimated cost of deaths attributed to MTR mining totals $42 billion per year, which outweighs the economic benefit five times over. And this is only the cost of deaths, not accounting for cancers and other diseases caused by the process.

The Role of the US Government in MTR

President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency has the power to end this destructive process but refuses to take a tough stand against mountaintop removal, preferring to try to make the process more environmentally friendly. On April 1, the EPA announced it would strengthen environmental permitting requirements for MTR, clarify how the agency uses the Clean Water Act to reduce water pollution and the resultant human health impacts, and increase transparency in the process of granting mining permits. This is a step in the right direction, but the EPA’s focus on making surface mining safer is problematic in its impossibility. The MTR process inherently violates the Clean Water Act and will continue to be devastating to people and communities even if some aspects of it are changed. The Obama Administration must start caring about Appalachian communities more than corporate campaign donations. This priority shift would surely motivate the EPA to bring an end to the practice of mountaintop removal altogether.

The Corporate Offenders Who Engage in MTR

Massey Energy is the largest producer of coal in Appalachia, having extracted more than 21 million tons from mountains in 2008. They violated the Clean Water Act over 4,500 times (environmental activists estimate closer to 12,000) between 2000 and 2006 by dumping toxic sediment from their 12 surface mines into rivers. The EPA filed suit against Massey and they were ultimately fined $20 million. This case calls attention to the process of mountaintop removal and how its impossible not to violate provisions of the Clean Water Act as surface mining is currently practiced.

Peabody Coal is the world’s largest coal mining company, operating in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, New Mexico, Tennessee and Wyoming. For four decades the US Government has assisted Peabody in attempts to force Navajo families off their ancestral homelands on Big Mountain and the surrounding communities around Black Mesa in Arizona. The communities continue to resist the forced relocation and construction of the Kayenta Mine.

Arch Coal is the second largest supplier of coal in the US and owner of the controversial Spruce Mine, the largest permitted site yet for MTR, in West Virginia. The mine was originally proposed in 1998 as a 3,100 acre expansion of another site that would have buried 10 miles of streams. Arch’s revised proposal from 2007 scaled the project back to encompassing 2,300 acres and 7 miles of streams. The company did obtain a permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers three years ago, which environmental groups have been fighting since. The EPA is considering shutting down the entire mine for “unacceptable adverse impact,” which it has the power to do under the Clean Water Act but has only done 12 times since 1970 and never when the mine has had a permit. In response, Arch Coal is suing the EPA .

Alpha Natural Resources recently merged with US mining company Foundation Coal to become the third-largest coal producer in the US. They now operate 40 surface mines and 14 coal preparation plants in Colorado, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

The Banks that Finance Coal Companies & Make MTR Possible

Citibank has lent billions to companies seeking to build new coal-fired power plants and companies that engage in mountaintop removal, such as Massey Energy, Foundation Coal, and Alpha Natural Resources. They recently released a policy for environmental due diligence regarding MTR. Other banks have less extensive ties, such as Wells Fargo who recently stopped investing in Massey Energy.

Bank of America used to be the biggest bank funder of mountaintop removal, helping finance $6 billion for Peabody Coal and $175 million for Massey Energy in 2006. They single-handedly invested $835 million in Foundation Coal in 2006, $700 million in Arch Coal over five years starting in 2006, and over $500 million in Alpha Natural Resources in 2005. Bank of America has since changed their coal policy to “phase out financing of companies whose predominant method of extracting coal is through mountain top removal.” Their use of “predominant” means their policy only applies to companies that engage in surface mine extraction as at least 50% of their overall operations. It has led them to decline deals with an estimated three companies so far, information about which has not been publicly released by the bank. Many claim that Bank of America has stopped financing MTR, which is false. They still falsely believe that the process “can be conducted in a way that minimizes environmental impacts.”

JP Morgan Chase has recently become the largest financier of mountaintop removal. Over the past 17 years they have helped underwrite nearly 20 bond or loan deals worth a combined $8.5 trillion. In 2009 they invested $600 million in Arch Coal, which mined 4.7 million tons of coal from mountaintops that year. In 2008 they acted as the lead manager on a $690 million bond offering to Massey Energy. They are the only mega bank that has not scaled down its investment in MTR in the past few years.

None of these banks have changed their policies willingly. Every victory for mountain communities and ecosystems represents years of struggle by social justice, environmental, and community groups. Shareholder resolutions have been a successful tactic to change coal companies’ policies. The Shareholder Advocacy Committee at Loyola University in Chicago filed a resolution with JP Morgan Chase after students traveled to Appalachia and witnessed the devastation of mountaintop removal firsthand. The resolution asks the bank to publicly report on the impact of MTR mining by clients and the financial impact on the bank if it were to ban MTR financing. Boston Common Asset Management has filed another resolution that demands that Chase adhere to their signature on the 2008 Carbon Principles Agreement, which would improve environmental impact disclosure and ultimately shift more funding into sustainable energy projects. If your school is invested in JP Morgan Chase you could get them to file a resolution to increase public pressure on the company. If you’d like to find out if you are invested, or for more information on filing a resolution, REC can help! Email us at info@endowmentethics.org. If you’re not part of an institution, think about where you keep your money and how you might be supporting MTR through your bank account. If you have an account with JP Morgan Chase, or another of the big banks who finance MTR, consider moving your money to a local credit union or community development bank and tell your old bank you switched because of their investments in mountaintop removal.

In addition to utilizing shareholder resolutions, justice groups have put pressure on JP Morgan Chase and other banks that invest in MTR through protests and direct actions. Coal River Mountain Watch is a grassroots Appalachian group that works to end MTR and rebuild sustainable communities, the Rainforest Action Network is running a campaign against Chase, the Sierra Club is running a Beyond Coal campaign, and Mountain Justice brings young activists to Appalachia during the spring and summer to engage in direct actions such as sit-ins in the West Virginia Governor’s office and pickets at Massey Energy headquarters. Recently the Church of Life After Shopping dumped toxic dirt from MTR sites in West Virginia outside JP Morgan Chase’s New York headquarters and other branches throughout the city. You could plan a similar action against Chase (or another financier) in your community by handing our fliers to customers, holding a sit-in inside a branch, or organizing a speaker or a rally to educate those around you about the devastation caused by mountaintop removal.