Colleges and Universities Should Join Major Institutional Investors in Voting for Annual Say on Pay

The Dodd-Frank financial reform bill requires a mandatory vote on whether advisory say on pay votes, which allow shareholders to approve or disapprove of executive compensation decisions, should occur every one, two or three years. Major institutional investors representing over $800 million in assets are calling for voters to vote for an annual referendum.

Colleges and universities, which promote open and informed dialogue in society, should vote alongside these investors in favor of an annual vote. Multi-stakeholder committees on investor responsibility often vote only environmental and social resolutions but say on pay is a matter that has social and governance implications, and one institutions of higher education should take seriously, and refer to their committees.

According to the release from AFSCME and Walden Asset Management, supporters of the annual votes include CalPERS, the New York State Common Retirement Fund, NYCERS, F&C Asset Management (U.K.), Hermes (U.K.), the General Board of Pension and Health Benefits of the United Methodist Church, Calvert Asset Management, Pax World and Amalgamated Bank. Mutual fund companies State Street, Vanguard, Fidelity and Putnam all have announced they will support these votes as well.

According to the release and statement:

“Unchecked and unapproved CEO pay directly contributed to the financial crisis,” said Gerald W. McEntee, President of AFSCME, which was the first sponsor of a shareholder resolution promoting an advisory vote on pay. “Companies with problematic pay practices or a history of ignoring shareholders will be seeking fewer votes. That’s why shareowners need to vote for annual say on executive pay.”

Timothy Smith, Senior Vice President of Walden Asset Management stated, “This will be a unique proxy season on executive compensation. Addressing excesses and problems with executive compensation requires a vote each and every year rather than occasional accountability every three years. Say on Pay votes have already stimulated re-thinking by Board Compensation Committees on various perks and controversial pay formulas. The discipline of an annual vote will encourage Boards to be more responsive and accountable on compensation.”

Read the full statement.

Keep in touch

Sign up to receive our updates and get access to all features of this website. Sign in with:

Latest from the blog

Sep 01, 2016
Subscribe to REC's quarterly newsletter today! We are thrilled to share updates on a number of exciting events, projects, and campaigns at REC!   This past summer, REC was able to launch its International Solidarity Program (ISP) to the Philippines with fossil fuel divestment organizers from across the country. Join...
Aug 31, 2016
  Notes on the Recent Department of Justice Decision To Move Not Renew Private Prison Contracts Photo:  (Reuters/Lucy Nicholson) The Department of Justice announced on August 18 that it will begin transitioning away from federally contracted private prisons, essentially transitioning around 22,000 individuals currently caged in 13 for-profit facilities to...
Aug 29, 2016
Are you searching for a profession that aligns your personal values with your desire for a career in finance?   Do you feel you need help identifying what roles exist in the impact investing industry and how to get your foot in the door? We are happy to share that our partners from The SRI Conference on Sustainable, Responsible, Impact Investing are...